Asia Agenda International
E-mail: info@asiagenda.com
Tel: +852 2872 5340   Fax: +852 2817 1404

The story so far

In the long-ago land of 1985 — as the Nikkei index readied for a run that would take it over the 40,000 level five years later — nine foreign trust banks were permitted to do business in Japan. The main attraction for these institutions was the potential fees to be earned from managing pension fund assets.

Two years later the trend-setting Nenpuku, an arm of the Ministry of Health and Welfare which overseas disposition of a portion of the funds contributed to the state pension scheme, said it would not use foreign trust banks’ services because they had insufficient experience in the local market.

This substance-chasing-shadow play continued for a decade although local and foreign Investment Advisory Companies (IACs) were allowed to set up for the first time in 1987.

Then, in a move often attributed wholly to foreign pressure and the resultant US-Japanese Financial Services pact of January 1995, real and lasting moves began to be made.

Behind them was a growing domestic desire for change as Japan faced up to the demographic pressures which by 2025 will give it a maximum of 2.1 workers per retiree compared with 6.4 today; when the return on pensions portfolios managed by life insurance companies is running at under 2%.

The same forces propelled calls from many older households for better returns on their savings than the near-zero rates offered by banks, the falling rewards on annuity policies and the meagre earnings available from domestic mutual funds with the Nikkei index unable to climb much above 15,000.

The unstoppable trends driving pension reform lit a fuse which burned slowly toward the November 1996 unveiling of the wider financial reform program dubbed Big Bang and scheduled for completion by 2001. Eight months later, 20 large Japanese banks asked for faster implementation of these measures so they could get into gear for the coming competition with foreign institutions.

Their pleas were denied. But they are now being heeded thanks to a fast deteriorating economy driving some smaller institutions out of business or into each others' arms; including the trust banks which play a major part in the stewardship of pensions money.

The introduction of defined-contribution retirement schemes has now been brought forward from 2001 to 2000 and the trust banking subsidiaries of securities firms will be allowed to manage pensions from October this year rather than sometime next.

Meanwhile pensions sponsors are being relieved of some of the burdens which, under Japan's unique three-tier system, they have been obliged to bear for state pensions. And legislation, which may come as early as Spring 1999, could set the scene for a restructuring of the system as well as the introduction of D-C plans.

A chronology detailing the disasters and developments that have quickened the pace of Japan’s financial reform, and gives a wider view than that below of the measures likely to be implemented by 2001, appears as an appendix to the second edition of Asia Agenda’s ground-breaking guide to the nation’s retirement-scheme system Inside Japan’s Pension Market.

The story in future

Fiscal 1999
= Ministry of Health and Welfare expected to introduce major pensions reform law based on the five options contained in its December 1997 white paper. All involve raising contribution rates to 20% or  more from 17.35% now. Option three considered the most likely.
= Elimination of the requirement that Employee Pension Funds (EPFs) liquidate all their holdings when changing investment managers.
= EPFs allowed to use IACs to manage 100% of their assets, up from 50% previously.
= Following the removal in February 1998 of fixed brokerage commissions on stock trades of over ¥50 million, those on trades of less than that amount to be scrapped.
= Regulations curbing the business activities of subsidiaries of securities houses and trust banks to be abolished by second half.
= Brokerages' trust-banking units to be allowed to manage pension funds, something only trust banks, insurers and IACs can do now.
Fiscal 1999 or later
= Nenpuku, which by the mid-1990s was taking the lead in awarding mandates to foreign IACs, expected to gain greater autonomy and control over the investment of all state pension contributions. This means that assets within its remit could increase from around ¥24 trillion to about ¥156 trillion.
= Yucho, the state-owned postal savings system and the biggest bank in the world by deposits, along with Kampo, the postal life insurance bureau, expected to gain permission to award specialist investment mandates to IACs. Trust banks are now the only outsiders to manage these funds. Yucho has ¥224 trillion of assets, Kampo ¥102 trillion.
= Life insurance companies expected to be allowed to distribute mutual funds; moving into a market to which commercial banks gained entry in December 1998.
Fiscal 2000
Fiscal 2001
= Banks, stockbrokers, trust banks and insurers to be given complete freedom of mutual entry into each other’s businesses.
No fixed date
= Licensing system used to regulate the number of securities brokers abolished so as to encourage new players.
Reproduction of this chronology
= If you use, or quote from, this chronology, please attribute it to Asia Agenda International's Japan Pensions Industry Database.